night 3Improvements from night 1 noticed for night 2:
1. Everyone was prepared. The show transitioned smoothly but the volume problem remains.
2. There was definitely less "dead air." Majority of the audience stood on their feet and got into the mood.
3. The rundown was rearranged and everything seemed to flow better.
4. The stages were equally used with the opening stage being used for more than 3 songs.
The usual:
1. As with night 1, Eason's consistent singing continues with his slow songs.
1. Everyone was prepared. The show transitioned smoothly but the volume problem remains.
2. There was definitely less "dead air." Majority of the audience stood on their feet and got into the mood.
3. The rundown was rearranged and everything seemed to flow better.
4. The stages were equally used with the opening stage being used for more than 3 songs.
The usual:
1. As with night 1, Eason's consistent singing continues with his slow songs.
2. For the fast songs, either the music is way too loud or something is wrong with the microphone because the audience can't hear Eason's voice at all.
The show:
After the first show the media focused heavily on the so-called "daring" dance numbers, but that was only 1/10th of the concert. Here are some clips of the other dance numbers and just singing from night 1:
These clips seem like they're from a professional angle, something television stations would air.
Sources:
on.cc 10.28.2007 for picture
Eason's fans who caught night 2's show
No comments:
Post a Comment